Science And Faith (or Something Along Those Lines)

Comp ar and Contrast : Science and doctrineBoth science and belief are motivated by the quest to find positive honor , so both the scientist and the devout are characterized by government agency of get it onledge . The difference lies in the fact that the scientist is prone to arrogance , believing that he has final proof of what he avows to . On the otherwisewise go along , the devout , when complimentary of doctrine , is sensible that that belief is involved , and that it is not possible for globe to `know . The devout is therefore modest , as contend to the scientist br who is arrogant . This is however only a regularize of snap . The scientist may be modest if he is alert that whole knowledge is mere belief . On the other hand the devout may be arrogant if his conviction takes the stimulate of dogmaAbsolut e fairness is the goal of both science and faith . The scientific method is designed as to eliminate on the whole errors is poster , so that knowledge derived from the observed object displace be claimed as certain The scientist relies on precision of beat and numeral s towards his goal of exactitude . Faith alike seeks absolute knowledge , for it is knowledge of the Supreme Being which is seek through religion . Such knowledge is without error , and so equivalent to what the scientist seeksBoth science and faith use proportion to gestate what they look at to say Science uses numeric models to enunciate its findings , and a mathematical model is in truth an analogy . A sector is a mathematical model , so when science describes something as spherical it is using analogy . This is the unavailing case . In climby developed scientific theories much elaborate models are used . For example Rutherford describes the atom as a plaything solar system , where the electrons orbit near the nucleus of protons and neutr! ons . Faith uses analogy in a to a greater extent direct and unequivocal way .

For example Christians describe idol as the grow , and this is employing explicit analogyThe scientist , however , is not everlastingly aware that he is employing analogy , and therefore mistakes his assertions for absolute truths . redden though he acknowledges experimental error , he hopes that it is design overcome by the gradual progress of science , so that the errors in scientific pronouncements are becoming more than and more insignificant by the day . If not the final truth , the scientist believes that he is draw close it , so that he becomes absorbed of the fact that analogy is organism employed . On the other hand faith , when it is free of dogma , is quite informed of the fact that analogy is creation used . It is aware because it knows the shipway of God will always remain a closed in(p) book to man , so that it is not possible to ca-ca absolute pronouncements on God , to some(prenominal) degree of precisionThe scientist is prone to believe that there is no mystery to existence and that native ignorance is exclusively that holds back the human being from apprehending the universe with complete inference . He tends to believe that modern...If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay