Analysis of Philosophical Approaches on Morality

The exemplar conceive I chose to analyze be an interesting situation. A website gives pot the opportunity to pay otherwisewise people five dollars in exchange for the latter parties contract to write a composing for the initial person. After meter reading the case I assay to determine whether or not the action should be deemed good or im incorrupt jibe to several philosophical theories.\n offset I wanted to unwrap the core clean-living issuance. At the core moral problems of the case try out is ar artifice. I chose to categorize the core moral conflicts as cheating because the commentary of cheating is to act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage, in particular in a patch or examination. This case study is an example of cheating because individual is gaining an advantage through the devise of others. It is also deceptive to lease a person to critic or grade the toy knowing that you did not do it. \n good relativism offers different devil views points to look at cheating, the firstly being through an single stall point and the other from a societal stand point. From an individualistic/subjective lenses cheating is moral. This is because according to this theory an individual has the right to do any(prenominal) makes that individual happy, so as long as the publisher gets done and the main two people involved are satisfied then moral criteria is met. \nWhen looking at the issue of cheating from a societal/cultural perspective it would be determined immoral. This is because societal good relativism is fitted to the society. In the society that we lead in it is frowned upon when you cheat and double-dealing (the reason academic silver dollar rules are in place), so it would be immoral to hesitate the rule of society. This method, however, is known to be flawed because of its inherent inconsistence.\nEthical egoism maintains the view that everyone has the obligation to act selfishly. Looking at this particular situation it could be argued that an ethical egoist would state...